First, the team totals:
Overall | ES | PP | SH | |||||||||||||
ChF | ChA | Net | % | ChF | ChA | Net | % | ChF | ChA | Net | % | ChF | ChA | Net | % | |
First Half | 655 | 815 | -160 | 44.6% | 505 | 630 | -125 | 44.5% | 141 | 17 | 124 | 89.2% | 8 | 167 | -159 | 4.6% |
Q3 | 338 | 408 | -70 | 45.3% | 270 | 318 | -48 | 45.9% | 55 | 20 | 35 | 73.3% | 10 | 66 | -56 | 13.2% |
Total | 993 | 1223 | -230 | 44.8% | 775 | 948 | -173 | 45.0% | 196 | 37 | 159 | 84.1% | 18 | 233 | -215 | 7.2% |
The Leafs have seen a marginal increase in their chance percentage over the last 20 games, but still remain around the 45% mark. They've been much better at generating chances shorthanded, but have also been more permissive on the powerplay themselves.
From extraskater.com, here are the Corsi data for the Leafs in the same situations:
Overall | ES | PP | SH | |||||||||||||
ChF | ChA | Net | % | ChF | ChA | Net | % | ChF | ChA | Net | % | ChF | ChA | Net | % | |
First Half | 2121 | 2744 | -623 | 43.6% | 1596 | 2125 | -529 | 42.9% | 347 | 45 | 302 | 88.5% | 25 | 409 | -384 | 5.8% |
Q3 | 1125 | 1380 | -255 | 44.9% | 1005 | 1223 | -218 | 45.1% | 179 | 42 | 137 | 81.0% | 15 | 215 | -200 | 6.5% |
Total | 3246 | 4124 | -878 | 44.0% | 2601 | 3348 | -747 | 43.7% | 526 | 87 | 439 | 85.8% | 40 | 624 | -584 | 6.0% |
The increase in chance percentage is matched by an increase in Corsi percentages.
Game | Opp | Overall | ES | PP | SH | ||||||||||||
ChF | ChA | Net | % | ChF | ChA | Net | % | ChF | ChA | Net | % | ChF | ChA | Net | % | ||
42 | DET | 11 | 22 | -11 | 33.3% | 9 | 16 | -7 | 36.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0.0% |
43 | NYR | 19 | 27 | -8 | 41.3% | 18 | 21 | -3 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0.0% |
44 | NYI | 15 | 11 | 4 | 57.7% | 11 | 9 | 2 | 55.0% | 4 | 1 | 3 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0.0% |
45 | CAR | 13 | 23 | -10 | 36.1% | 12 | 13 | -1 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0.0% | 1 | 9 | -8 | 10.0% |
46 | WAS | 23 | 17 | 6 | 57.5% | 13 | 16 | -3 | 44.8% | 8 | 0 | 8 | 100.0% | 2 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
47 | NJD | 20 | 22 | -2 | 47.6% | 15 | 17 | -2 | 46.9% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0.0% |
48 | BOS | 13 | 22 | -9 | 37.1% | 7 | 17 | -10 | 29.2% | 5 | 2 | 3 | 71.4% | 1 | 3 | -2 | 25.0% |
49 | BUF | 15 | 13 | 2 | 53.6% | 12 | 11 | 1 | 52.2% | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0.0% |
50 | MTL | 16 | 20 | -4 | 44.4% | 13 | 16 | -3 | 44.8% | 3 | 0 | 3 | 100.0% | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0.0% |
51 | PHX | 12 | 24 | -12 | 33.3% | 8 | 13 | -5 | 38.1% | 4 | 5 | -1 | 44.4% | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0.0% |
52 | COL | 17 | 18 | -1 | 48.6% | 13 | 16 | -3 | 44.8% | 4 | 1 | 3 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0.0% |
53 | DAL | 8 | 22 | -14 | 26.7% | 8 | 19 | -11 | 29.6% | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0.0% |
54 | WPG | 15 | 19 | -4 | 44.1% | 12 | 15 | -3 | 44.4% | 3 | 1 | 2 | 75.0% | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0.0% |
55 | TBL | 17 | 23 | -6 | 42.5% | 13 | 13 | 0 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | -1 | 40.0% | 2 | 7 | -5 | 22.2% |
56 | FLA | 17 | 18 | -1 | 48.6% | 12 | 14 | -2 | 46.2% | 4 | 1 | 3 | 80.0% | 1 | 3 | -2 | 25.0% |
57 | OTT | 16 | 13 | 3 | 55.2% | 13 | 12 | 1 | 52.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
58 | FLA | 15 | 19 | -4 | 44.1% | 14 | 19 | -5 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
59 | TBL | 31 | 20 | 11 | 60.8% | 28 | 20 | 8 | 58.3% | 3 | 0 | 3 | 100.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
60 | VAN | 16 | 12 | 4 | 57.1% | 14 | 7 | 7 | 66.7% | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0.0% |
61 | NYI | 14 | 25 | -11 | 35.9% | 12 | 19 | -7 | 38.7% | 1 | 2 | -1 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
62 | MTL | 15 | 18 | -3 | 45.5% | 13 | 15 | -2 | 46.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | -1 | 33.3% |
Here is ES chance data for the Leafs by period:
First Half | Q3 | Total | |||||||
Period | For | Against | Ch% | For | Against | Ch% | For | Against | Ch% |
1 | 156 | 200 | 43.8% | 80 | 110 | 42.1% | 236 | 310 | 43.2% |
2 | 164 | 204 | 44.6% | 86 | 95 | 47.5% | 250 | 299 | 45.5% |
3 | 150 | 198 | 43.1% | 95 | 95 | 50.0% | 245 | 293 | 45.5% |
4 | 25 | 13 | 65.8% | 7 | 14 | 33.3% | 32 | 27 | 54.2% |
Despite the increase overall, the Leafs have been worse in first periods than in the first half; the uptick has come in the second, and especially in the third, where Toronto has been much more effective.
First Half | Q3 | Total | |||||||
State | For | Against | Ch% | For | Against | Ch% | For | Against | Ch% |
Close | 295 | 372 | 44.2% | 155 | 188 | 45.2% | 450 | 560 | 44.6% |
The uptick for the Leafs in chances has also come in close situations, though 45% is still very low in these situations.
I looked again at the Leafs in the third period, to compare how they were at defending and chasing leads.
First Half | Q3 | Total | |||||||
State | For | Against | Ch% | For | Against | Ch% | For | Against | Ch% |
3rd Chasing | 47 | 46 | 50.5% | 28 | 18 | 60.9% | 75 | 64 | 54.0% |
Down 1 | 31 | 27 | 53.4% | 20 | 16 | 55.6% | 51 | 43 | 54.3% |
Down 2 | 16 | 19 | 45.7% | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | 24 | 21 | 53.3% |
3rd Defending | 54 | 83 | 39.4% | 31 | 28 | 52.5% | 85 | 111 | 43.4% |
Up 1 | 35 | 54 | 39.3% | 12 | 16 | 42.9% | 47 | 70 | 40.2% |
Up 2 | 19 | 29 | 39.6% | 19 | 12 | 61.3% | 38 | 41 | 48.1% |
The Leafs were strongly improved in both areas during the third period; wht most striking difference was their performance while defending two goal leads, which was substantially improved over the first half, Toronto managed to generate more chances than their opponents while defending 3rd period leads, which is almost the reverse situation that they were encountering in the first half.
Next, an overall summary of the Leafs' performance at different score states.
First Half | Q3 | Total | |||||||
State | For | Against | Ch% | For | Against | Ch% | For | Against | Ch% |
-4 | 6 | 9 | 40.0% | 7 | 5 | 58.3% | 13 | 14 | 48.1% |
-3 | 16 | 20 | 44.4% | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 21 | 23 | 47.7% |
-2 | 37 | 52 | 41.6% | 27 | 21 | 56.3% | 64 | 73 | 46.7% |
-1 | 90 | 93 | 49.2% | 51 | 53 | 49.0% | 141 | 146 | 49.1% |
Trailing | 149 | 174 | 42.1% | 90 | 82 | 52.3% | 239 | 256 | 42.9% |
0 | 168 | 231 | 42.1% | 94 | 118 | 44.3% | 262 | 349 | 42.9% |
Leading | 152 | 196 | 44.4% | 72 | 91 | 44.2% | 224 | 287 | 44.9% |
1 | 103 | 129 | 44.4% | 42 | 49 | 46.2% | 145 | 178 | 44.9% |
2 | 33 | 46 | 41.8% | 21 | 19 | 52.5% | 54 | 65 | 45.4% |
3 | 12 | 9 | 57.1% | 5 | 22 | 18.5% | 17 | 31 | 35.4% |
4 | 4 | 12 | 25.0% | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 8 | 13 | 38.1% |
The Leafs have increased while trailing, but are almost the same when trailing by one; they've seen their improvement come when trailing by multiple points. They also haven't improved much while leading overall, but it's bin the opposite, as a couple of early leads in games have meant that they have much worse numbers when leading by three, but have slightly improved with one and two goal leads.
No comments:
Post a Comment